2013 Resolution

My 2013 Resolution: Undo 2012. Yep, it was a genuinely terrible year. The Mayans were wrong and that was only the tip of the iceberg. However I hope and I believe – beyond all reason and all possible justification – that something has to happen in this New Year. The alternative just cannot be so.

–Michael D. Bobo

Now on Burnside: A Reason to be Angry

Media_http3bpblogspot_jplrb
In my youth, I was scared out of listening to non-Christian music. It was the “devil’s music” and it had “no redeeming value.” Names like Judas Priest and Megadeth proved the argument in my childish brain. After all, they did use the Lord’s name in vain and a whole slew of other “heathen profanities.”  Right? For years I shied away from rock music in general and felt comfortable hunkered down in my fundamentalist shelter. (I laugh and shiver inside remembering how Chicago was ground for trouble in my suburban Christian context!)

 

Much to my parents’ disappointment, I gently eased in to the world of secular music during my junior high and high school years. R.E.M. and U2 used some religious references so I felt emotionally safe. This naïve notion failed to consider Michael Stipe’s openly bisexual lifestyle, which should have immediately ruled out any acceptance of his music. Bono’s alter ego Mephisto in the Zoo TV Tour didn’t help the cause either. Consistency hardly motivated my choices. As I familiarized myself with the “worldly” music, I remember feeling so afraid of this new reality opening itself to me. Could it be that my parents and their friends were right? A fear-induced caution to music left me years behind the curve on the latest, greatest music. And for that, I feel robbed.

 

Surrogate Families

Media_httpimgwyliocom_pczug

photo © 2007 Stuart Richards | more info (via: Wylio)

The family is no longer a home in our time. It is no longer safe to be with family or at home. Many of us in our late twenties and thirties have parents whose poor choices in the 60s and 70s left us to experience the weight of their irresponsibility. We have been the caretakers for our parents in emotional, practical, spiritual, and psychological ways. Marriages that ended in divorce or in emotional disconnection in the 80s and 90s have left us in the 2000s to be the surrogate husbands or wives – stuck in the middle of two warring parties whom we love.

It is extremely difficult to admit this to our parents and ourselves. Even if we have a unique relationship that is transparent enough to consider these harsh conditions, it is nearly impossible to sit down and talk through the pain, disappointment and frustration we all experience in this generation of familial brokenness. We are the ones who suffer these things silently. The break up of marriages across North America has left our generation to face some brutal realities.

Where do we go from here? If there is no home among ones closest kin where else can we turn?

Some have turned to local churches. It is tempting to see the Biblical language of familial relationships and expand what God intended spiritually into a substitute family. I can attest first hand that the Church was never intended to replace our parents and siblings. Simply calling fellow members “brother” and “sister” does not supplant biological equivalents. Seeing pastors and leaders as father or mother figures is dangerous. I was deceived as a younger man and I pray that others may hear my warning before making similar mistakes.

In specific cases, orphans and widows who are lacking these tangible connections should see the Church in this way since they literally have no other family. For those suffering loss the Biblical language of family touches deep wounds and helps account for the loss of biological relations. Although church relationships may become a substitute family in unique cases of abandonment or death, it was never intended to supplant the biological family.

For the majority of us who have living breathing relatives, there is a huge temptation to disengage. This is the very context in which one can be a positive influence for Christ. Our families need us to be examples and witnesses of Christ’s love to them. Candidly, it is difficult to face those closest to us with the compassion of Christ. It is perfectly okay to admit this. Quitting on the family is inexcusable. The impatience or awkwardness one feels in spiritually engaging his family is no excuse to relinquish one’s sense of responsibility as a member.

I met this personally in a young congregation where extreme conversions were the norm. In particular, newer Christians who did not have solid emotional ties to their parents and siblings cherished the opportunity to have other “family” members who saw the world similarly. Oftentimes this positive connection to the church increased the struggle with their biological families. “Why can’t ______ believe in Christ?” was a staple question I confronted in counseling sessions with them. This is a normal growth process that all of us with family members with other religious persuasions must learn to confront.

Since churches include members with strong familial bonds there is another issue to discuss. Unfulfilled expectations may instill intense disappointment. The peak of membership in a new family can lead to the crash of alienation. The sense of abandonment from both biological and spiritual families may result. Individuals whose unhealthy expectations are placed upon the church often become disillusioned upon realizing others do not have the same degree of emotional ecstasy in simply belonging. Frustration may quickly set in once this emotionally fragile person sees their local church for what it really is intended for. He or she may feel conned when the language of family is misappropriated. The intense connectedness initially increases the potential for a painful departure from the church.

If this is not bad enough, we have suffered the fate of the unfortunate emergence of smooth talking preachers lamentably found on television. We have suffered their follies, their false promises, their flattering words offering a better life full of all the bliss and joy we have been longing for. Get rich and get holy quick schemes do not produce genuinely righteous living. What does it cost us? How do we get it? Give them money, buy their books, promote their products, wear their t-shirts and you will see. Far from being fatherly and motherly figures, these leaders have likewise proven to be suspect. Once again the issue is the expectation for pastors, ministers and clergy to replace the massive psychological void left by the broken family. This is a major concern that we need to call to attention.

The problem is not with the Church. The problem is not so much with the language either. The danger comes from misapplied familial terms and the elevation of spiritual relationships. Beware of pastors who may try to replace your fatherly or motherly bonds. Beware of overly connected church groups who rely upon this language of family to evoke guilt feelings or intensify responsibility to the group’s mission. These are huge red flags. The Church is not supposed to be a literal family, but an agent of healing for broken families. If you find yourself becoming more frustrated with your biological family and wish to spend more time with your church members, it is time to stop and take an emotional inventory. The Church exists to mend broken relationships. Christ and his Church are agents of reconciliation.

The real problem begins with our families. We need to admit this state of affairs and work on restoring family bonds within broken and blended families. The Church cannot fill this void. It was never meant to. Seeking a surrogate family in the church will only leave one feeling hollow and frustrated. We need to begin by addressing the true problems and not just the symptoms.

I pray this will help bring a voice to some of the silent cries we have felt in this generation. It is time to talk about these things with those closest to us. Christians beware. You have one family. One biological family. Let your church serve its purpose and you will know how to be in a family as a Christian. This is hard and emotionally taxing, but it is Christ’s intention for his Church.

Lord Save Us from Your Followers

This is exactly what 22nd century faith must address. Why is the Gospel of Love Dividing America? It is exactly what I pray we can realize as a global Church. The pre-believing world is looking for salvation from us – from the followers of Christ. Not from their sins. Not from their despair. Not from their future in hell that awaits. The fear is increasingly of us. The hell fire, brimstone message is not working anymore. The legalistic rules and requirements of Fundamentalism only alienate and confirm reasons not to believe. We must awaken to the reality of how we have been perceived. It is not their fault. It is not the world’s problem. It is our lack of a loving, relevant form of communication. We are outmoded and anachronistic. The first step is acceptance.

Acceptance vs. Accommodation

The Jesus I Never Knew and Church: Why Bother? illustrate the value of honesty and acceptance. Yancey is one of my favorite authors because he is not afraid to ask honest questions about the Church’s mission. The key to his approach is in the truth that acceptance is not accommodation. Acceptance is the willingness to see the other person for who they are – no matter what they believe or what they do – and to remain committed to one’s own beliefs. Accommodation is yielding one’s beliefs to those of another. The Church of the 22nd century must accept the world, not accommodate it.

http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=widgetsamazon-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=031021923X&fc1=44444&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=444444&bc1=ffffff&bg1=ffffff&f=ifrhttp://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=widgetsamazon-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=B003TFE2E8&fc1=444444&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=444444&bc1=ffffff&bg1=ffffff&f=ifr

Vindication (or my addiction to change affirmed)

Media_httpimgwyliocom_bhfcc

photo © 2007 LASZLO ILYES | more info (via: Wylio)

Recently I have discovered that I am in good company. Any of you who have read me for any length of time realize that I my addiction to re-manipulating this site is beyond imagination, reason, words. I apologize, but I acknowledge I am a fool, trying to perfect the art of religious writing, which is clearly an impossible, and ridiculous, feat. Have we ever had more dialog, dispute, out right violence in human history on the religious scene? If so, I would suggest this is at least ranked among the most contentious periods of religious tension.

All that to say I realized that Scot McKnight of the Jesus Creed fame has recently moved from Beliefnet to Patheos. This puts me somewhat at ease. I am not the only one whose obsession with trying to perfect the imperfect and master the unmasterable is manifest for all to see.

Eighth Letter

Media_http1bpblogspot_hvdsx

I am grateful to Rachel Held Evans for informing me about this upcoming event. Eighth Letter is something which has the potential to shake the North American Church if we have ears to hear and hearts to receive whatever may come.
I have chosen to speak from the voice of Jesus as I envision what He would say to us in North America in the style of the letters to the churches in Revelation.
Please comment below and share as you feel led.
Peace to you all.
~~~~~
A Letter from Jesus Christ to the churches in North America:
My precious children who have been given so much. I want you to know how much I love you, how much I gave myself for you, how much I have blessed and equipped you to reach my Creation. I pray you have ears to hear and a humble heart to listen to my pleas to you – for you.
You have been made a unique body for such a time as this. The future challenges you will face are going to require all the wonderful talents, abilities, strengths, resources, and convictions that you have been bountifully bestowed by my Father, by my Spirit and by me.
I simply state what I need from you so that you may fulfill all that is given you before my return.
I am the creator and sustainer of all life. The sanctity of life must be preserved in its entirety in my Church. I have given life and I need my people to preach a message of life. Remember this truth.
I am the savior. North American churches you are my Church. Allegiances are to me first. Everything else is secondary. The world needs a Church, not churches.
I am the peacemaker. Peace is first spiritual – a condition of the heart, which must start from within you churches into the World.
I am love and the lover of all souls. Love is willing to suffer with, laugh with, share with, bear with. Love is your commission. This is not merely acceptance of others as they are. Love is showing my love for you through you to the world.
I am the lover of sinners and the Judge of the self-righteous. Honestly assess yourselves. You are sinners whom I love. If you do not agree, you will meet my judgment.
I am the father to the fatherless and the defender of widows. See clearly whom you are called to serve and care for as a richly blessed Church. I will avenge and protect these precious ones. Woe to whomever exploits these for personal gain.
I am a missionary. You are my ambassadors. I now send you into the world to be my arms of compassion; my ears to hear the cries of distant lands; my eyes to see the outcast, the oppressed, the exploited, the lost, the despairing, the homeless, the helpless, the hopeless; my mouth to speak words of clarity, conviction, truth, and freedom; my legs to go and walk to the hardest places, the unreached people, the calloused hearts.
Go now, my Church, and be My Church. You have so much to do and so little time for your petty disputes. The time has come to be all that I have made you to be. You must be Christ to all. I commission you now until my return to fulfill your mission.
Peace be to you and to all those who call upon my Name.

Calling All Pastors!

Where were the Francis Chans and the John Pipers ten years ago? It’s so ironic when I reflect upon the nature of pastoral calling Piper is one example of ministerial Sabbath buzzing through the blogosphere. The passionate pit bull in Minneapolis played a huge role in my departure from America to pursue missions at a break neck pace. God’s sense of humor manifests once more.

I would have loved the public example of balance and freedom to draw upon as seen by the recent decisions by Chan and Piper. My gut impulse felt it was okay to take a break (Piper). There are seasons of pastoral ministry (Chan)! Oh, for a time machine to know what to say and how to say it! Instead, I have grappled with many questions about my calling in life and have mounted up ample frustrations with the practical theology which depletes our pastors nationwide.

I recall vividly the inner wrestling and lack of clarity about the question presented by the pastors at a small southern California church.

“Michael, do you feel called to be a pastor?”

“I don’t really know,” I sheepishly retorted.

In my honest uncertainty, I asked for some time to reassess this question and search my soul. Was I “called” to be a pastor? What is a calling really anyway? I felt that it was my duty to figure out what the Biblical calling entailed. So as a good fundamentalist, I scoured the Good Book and looked up every reference on pastoral ministry, church leadership, and calling to ministry. Of course, I took the liberties to make the Scripture conform to my perspective in order to translate what I should have known all along. No one chapter or verse assuaged the doubts or erased my deepest fears. But, I had to present something, right? My own sense of personal identity would be inadequate. There had to be a textual indicator. So, I fasted, prayed, read, fasted, prayed, read, wrestled, doubted – you get the idea. How would I respond? Calling. Is that the best way to consider a heart that wants to reach out to the hurting. A heart full of compassion for the poor. A heart that looks to benefit the Church as a whole body.

Going back to the Scriptures, to my surprise, I found a variety of roles in which the early Church operated that no longer had significance in my local church. As a young, single man on the mission field I identified more with the apostolic and prophetic ministries in the early church. But, I didn’t really know if I was a weekly message deliverer – aka a “modern day pastor.” I had public speaking experience in a variety of churches. Denomination did not really matter to me. I just wanted to share a unique word on a Sunday morning with a group of people. Hopefully we both would be refreshed and challenged in the process. This was where my calling appeared most evidently. I felt like I belonged there, but we did not have a staff position for persons like me. I did not fit the assistant pastor mold or the mold did not fit me.

As I searched my heart and attempted to find a clearer answer for my pastoral board, I faced even more questions about the way church is done in America. If the early Church had many positions of leadership, why have we boiled down the focus upon one, or two melded together into one? The pastor-teacher function is most prominent in our local churches today, so what could be two distinct individuals or groups of individuals, now boils down into one person. One ego. One celebrity. One cult of personality. It makes perfect sense in our individualistic, rationalistic society that we value the thoughts of one person over the entire congregation in our weekly meetings.

But I look at the Scriptures and I see there were many persons involved in making the Church function on a regular basis. There were the apostolic, itinerant ministers like Jesus. There were the prophetic individuals who had a word in season at one particular time and did not have to continue weekly messages or contributions. There were pastoral figures who had leadership abilities. Notice this next one: there were distinct persons known as teachers who were gifted at instructing members. There were also those who brought new members in. I imagine that these evangelists were nothing like the ones seen on television today. We do not know their names, we do not see them in a prominent place, and we do not attribute to them a pompousness that repulses the unchurched.

Chan and Piper are distinct reminders of why our current system needs to be discussed and revamped.

Piper has been productively, passionately laboring, speaking, teaching, and writing for decades; he finally reached a point as an individual – whose successes are remarkable – that Sabbath rest is necessary. Listening to him in my early missionary days, I still hear his shrill, intense voice calling an army of youth such as I to go do the hardest work in the hardest places. I chose Uganda among Sudanese refugees. These persecuted believers had experienced some of the most atrocious acts of violence since the Holocaust. I pushed, I pressed, I did all that I could to embody Piper’s message of the one who would die for the gain of Christ. (I nearly died a few times.) God mercifully spared me despite me. I believe part of His calling now is that I can deliver a message that Piper finally gets. Pastors are people, too.

Israel had an annual Sabbath as a nation and their collective disobedience to let the land rest one year out of seven brought forth their exile from the promised land. I see this as a principle and a warning to leaders today. There must be a Sabbath rest in our ministerial lands. Pastors need a break from their churches, and churches need a break from their pastors. The burn out that is so common among contemporary pastors illustrates the wisdom of the Scriptures. A team of leaders working together, sharing the load, just as the early Church embodied, is far more profitable and efficient. Burn out is less frequent when the individual becomes a collective. It’s just plain statistics and math. Sharing the load is not compromise or failure. Look at Piper, even the great man himself needs to stop at times.

Chan is a rapidly rising superstar. Notice when he chose to move on. Not at the decline or the slightest sign of slowing down in his popularity. He left his position during the ascent. His choice to move on baffles countless young seminarians who would dream of being in his position. All their studying, hoping, praying, dreaming to be like, well, like Francis Chan. He’s a great example of making it to the top, right? Uh, oh! He did what? How could he hand it over? How could he entrust all of that to someone else? I suggest he got the Biblical vision of ministry and saw that no one pastor is really called to shoulder the burden. No one personality is big enough for hundreds or thousands of people to be directed by and led into maturity. He got it. Thank God for Francis Chan. This is one of the best examples of the second principle I felt down deep all these years. Ministry can be a season or there can be seasons of ministry.

I have not spoken from a pulpit in five years. I am not a missionary. I am a married man with a beautiful three year old boy. My church consists of three members if you count myself. And even in my little sphere of influence I share the leadership with my dear wife. Even in a church of three I need a partner.

So, we consider Piper and Chan. Calling all pastors! Calling all pastors! It is okay to rest. It is okay to share. It is even Biblical.

Now on Burnside: “It’s All Gonna Burn…Or Is It?”

I suppose this has been a good summer for me. On many levels, I have realized some important things about faith, the future and our future faith. For those of you who have endured the journey of my faith blog and seen it come full circle, I present to you a clearer explanation. I have stopped blogging on Our Future Faith and have brought it as an archived site in my personal site.

Why would I just quit in the midst of so much hubbub? Because there has been an awakening of Evangelical consciousness upon the future. I am delighted to share this and feel my part is done in that stage of blogging.
Also, consider this my brief but lucid review of Brian Mclaren‘s books that I digested eagerly this summer.

I will continue to write for Burnside and any other communities I can infiltrate. Thank you for reading and commenting. I have thoroughly enjoyed this journey so far and I pray that something I have written will jar some goodness and grace in your souls, too.

Now on Burnside: Cults of Celebrity

Media_http2bpblogspot_mjjod

I have a piece on Burnside that you might want to read. In it, I explore the “Cults of Celebrity” that are common place in the Evangelical world. Have you ever placed a leader on a pedestal? If so, you may ask yourself, “Why does he/she have that place in my life?” I have suffered much in my life as a Christian by mistakenly placing men in an emotional place that only belongs to Jesus.

I would appreciate your thoughts and comments there and here.

Non-retaliation

This simple video captivates something that is one of the most challenging aspects of the teachings of Jesus. If we all merely applied this principle, there would be a much more beautiful world. The hard thing about life on Earth is that humans have a natural tendency to seek retributions for wrongs done. I was just talking to my wife last night and, in light of the atrocities going on in Nigeria right now between Muslims and Christians, it dawned on me that this is why the path of the Christian life is truly a harder, higher calling. We are called to transcend the gut impulses to react to the first stone thrown at us and to not only receive the blow but continue approaching our enemies without a motivation of vengeance. Ouch! This is something I need worked deeply into my soul. May we all consider how to use the stones thrown at us by our enemies to build bridges.

Untitled

This simple video captivates something that is one of the most challenging aspects of the teachings of Jesus. If we all merely applied this principle, there would be a much more beautiful world. The hard thing about life on Earth is that humans have a natural tendency to seek retributions for wrongs done. I was just talking to my wife last night and, in light of the atrocities going on in Nigeria right now between Muslims and Christians, it dawned on me that this is why the path of the Christian life is truly a harder, higher calling. We are called to transcend the gut impulses to react to the first stone thrown at us and to not only receive the blow but continue approaching our enemies without a motivation of vengeance. Ouch! This is something I need worked deeply into my soul. May we all consider how to use the stones thrown at us by our enemies to build bridges.

Read this on Michael’s Blog

True Treasure

Media_httpuploadwikim_ebbtp
I thought this word for the day from gratefulness.org was worth sharing today.

Where you stumble, there your treasure lies. ~Joseph Campbell

According to Joseph Campbell, I am a very wealthy man. I love this thought, though, since it puts into perspective our struggles, trials and temptations. Instead of thinking of a battle in which we have to war against the evils of the world to stay “pure,” “undefiled” and “perfect” I believe our future faith needs to use this metaphor of treasure.

Our flaws, faults and wrinkles are opportunities. They are precious and priceless. This is true only when we learn from them and use them for our greater good. I agree with the Apostle Paul, “Shall we sin that grace may abound? Certainly not.” (Rom. 6:15) However, when we do, we can learn. We can grow. We can see the redemption of Christ in the midst of our humanity.

War metaphor versus treasure metaphor. Something to consider. I do not believe this devalues the work of Christ’s redemption. I see it as making his work even more precious. The perspective on our current state after the cross is what changes. Instead of fighting with the world we can engage the world with a missional mindset. Our mistakes and our defeats will make us rich in wisdom. Bubble be gone; we are headed into this world. We are going to stumble, but we are going to be rich for trying.

A Lesson in Losing

 

This Lent I decided to fast communication on my blog and social networking sites for regrouping spiritually and intellectually.  I channeled my passions toward publishers and other websites, hoping to have a breakthrough.  What was I thinking?  A season of Lent, to start something – are you kidding me?  I now realize how priceless my lack of success really is because a principle emerged in my experience that deserves some careful consideration.

 

Lent is a season of learning to lose. That’s right.  This may not seem like a huge revelation for some, but learning to lose is a virtue for Christians seeking a well-rounded spiritual life.  It’s true for our Lord and it’s especially true for us.  We have the benefit of the larger perspective from Christ’s triumphant return from the dead, but there needs to be a season of reflection upon his conflict with religious leaders, denial by his disciples and his torturous death.  This annual reminder is a huge slap in the face to the prosperity-driven, consumerist Christianity that appears on television of late.  There are seasons where Christians lose.  There are seasons where the world is triumphant.  Life is not always fair and things are not always just.

 

So, why would this harsh reality check be a necessary annual lesson for the Church?  Isn’t the Church on Earth to help usher in victory, justice and truth?  Isn’t the Christian life one of Spirit-filled conquest?  I suggest that Lent itself is our answer with a resounding, “NO.”  Losing is a necessary part of living the victorious Christian life.  The cross is a means to experience the empty tomb.  Jesus is our example in this, and I can’t think of a better person to illustrate a truth to us Christians.

 

Losing gracefully, patiently and faithfully is a necessary experience for the Church.  This annual reminder is an essential humbling that prevents authentic Christianity from becoming a crusading, fundamentalist, “we’re gonna takeover the world” movement.  Losing demonstrates the transcendence of God in His dominion over all creation.  Rather than trust in our own resources, our own craftiness, our own method, we Christians have to cry out to the Lord for deliverance, for peace, for hope, for justice.  We have to rely upon Him to be the Deliverer, the Peacemaker, the Giver of hope, the Judge of all men.  Is that really so bad?  It hurts our fragile egos, but it puts us in a proper place of dependence.  So, I propose, Lent and losing are essential and valuable after all for us today as a community of believers.  Instead of dismissing it as an antiquated ritual that serves little purpose, it is a crucial yearly reminder of our place in the cosmic scheme of things.

 

 

Thank you, Jane!

I couldn’t resist breaking my self-imposed silence for Lent to share this beautiful comment.  Thank you, Jane for your well reasoned thoughts.

I agree that it is not good to suffer silently. From what I’ve experienced in church, many Christians are afraid to admit they are suffering or hurting. That’s why it’s hard to find authentic, Christian community. I think Christians are afraid to admit they are suffering or what they have suffered in the past because are we not all supposed to be living the “victorious Christian life”? Yet, when the past is not dealt with (especially the hurts and sins done against you), it usually comes back to bite you. Yet I don’t think the church or people in positions of leadership necessarily know how to create a community of healing, even though that is what the church and leaders might want. What’s worse is when people just give you a Bible verse and just leave you to deal with the pain yourself because they don’t have any answers or tools to help you. Most people are not trained to know how to deal with other people’s hurts.

I think we all want to be healed, but at the same time we don’t want to dwell on the past and be stuck as victims. Maybe people are afraid that digging up the past is just a useless griping session. As many well-meaning Christians have said, “Forget the past. Press on ahead,” making reference to Paul’s letter in Philippians. Then there’s counseling/ therapy (secular or Christian). Some churches don’t think it’s a valid recourse since the word of God is sufficient for every need and has all the answers. I personally think that counseling serves a purpose and has some good in it, but ultimate healing and resolution are found in God and the work He has done for us on our behalf. Two books that I’ve read which have helped me understand healing are “12 Christian Beliefs That Can Drive You Crazy” by Cloud and Townsend and “A Journey To Wholeness: Intimately Involving God In Prayer for Resolution and Healing” by Richard D. Smith (www.cross-resources.org).

For me admitting and sharing the hurts from the past was the first step in the healing process. What is absolutely necessary to the healing process is also understanding the consequences of sin done against you as well as your sins towards others and asking the Heavenly Father to break the power of those sins & consequences in your life. Another absolute necessity is forgiveness and what that all entails. It is not just letting the other person off the hook. God took sin seriously and paid for every sin by blood; therefore, we should NEVER excuse someone else’s sin, no matter high small, and no matter if we love them. Then one must go before the Heavenly Father and ask Him to reveal the “lies” that have shaped your life, asking Him to break the power of each lie, and asking for a specific truth to replace each lie. Then the hard work begins of living out the those truths, becoming the person God created you to be and redeemed you to be. Truths become easier as you reject the lies. There’s a lot more to share, but I am not going to write a book here. My journey of going back to the past and finding healing has not been easy, but it has definitely worth it because God wants each of His children to live life abundantly.

A Broken Generation

 

This post is to all of us broken souls, who have been disappointed by our parents, our friends, our pastors, our own selves. I have received an epiphany which has been the driving passion behind my blog and my yearning for a future Church a future faith that transcends all this #$*=^~ (fill in your favorite expletive) generation’s lot in the scope of things.

 

We largely come from parents’ whose poor choices in the 60s and 70s have caused us to experience the weight of their irresponsibility.  We have been the caretakers for our parents in emotional, practical, spiritual, and psychological ways due to marriages that ended in divorce or in emotional disconnection in the 80s and 90s, leaving us to be the surrogate husbands or wives who are stuck in the middle of two warring parties whom we love.

 

If this is not bad enough, we have suffered the fate of Evangelicalism’s elevation of young, inexperienced smooth talking preachers who have not lived life enough to even merit their worth in salt.  We have suffered their follies, their false promises, their flattering words promising a better life that is full of all the bliss and joy that we are lacking now.  What does it cost us?  How do we get it?  Give them money, buy their books, promote their products, wear their t-shirts and you will see.  We are the ones who suffer these things.

 

I am tired of suffering silently.  I believe we need to speak out as a generation who has suffered these things. We need to share our hopes, dreams, frustrations, longings for more, for a better Christianity.  For justice. For genuine churches. For living faith.

 

What is your story?  What have you suffered?  I suggest there is healing to be received by acknowledging these disappointments and frustrations with the folly of our spiritual and biological predecessors.  For centuries myths and legends have served a cathartic function. Today it is time to revamp the storytelling tradition and to share lessons we have learned. Whether it be through poetry, prose, thought fragments, music, or art, it is time for us to express ourselves in this generation.  We are the ones who can make a better, fuller future faith by just owning our pasts and moving ahead freed from these chains.  Freed to be authentic.  Freed to live, to love, to hope, to dream. Let’s be free.

 

On Clichés

Christianity over the past thirty years has been flooded with clichés - to the degree that a language has been created, mockingly labeled “Christianese.” As a younger man, I was guilty of using these clichés and not really thinking about how necessary it is to relate to the common woman or man whose experience is broader than the bubble of the church.  22nd Century faith must confront this ingenuousness that is rampant from the most popular leaders to the average church members. Sitting in a Bible study or small group will reveal how this occurs. Rather than confront the raw realities of life, it is easy to fall under the sway of phrases like “I’ll pray for you” or “God bless you.” Such all to common phrases mask the true mental conversation that sounds something like: “I do not want to listen to all of this negativity and I need a way out.” Honestly, it is more difficult, more painful, more self-sacrificial to get in the trenches and confront life’s injustices, pains and disappointments.  It is emotionally taxing to listen and to care for those whose faith is not a guarantee for health, wealth and prosperity.

Our future faith must be genuine enough to break down the comfortable phraseology and to deal with the harsher realities of unemployment, illness, failure, doubt, anxiety, homelessness, sexual addiction . . . .   These realities which plague our churches, our families, our selves.  Let’s take the first step to get beyond these clichés and begin to communicate authentically.  If life sucks, it is time to say it.Faith does not answer all of the questions, remedy all of the paradoxes and cure all of the woes.  Faith is a framework, a foundation, to establish one’s life upon.  All of life’s circumstances can rest upon a Christian worldview.  It is a strong, steadfast basis for confronting whatever may come. I have believed through losses, disappointments, illnesses, family strife, death of dreams.  I have believed and I do believe that our future faith must be such. 

What is Truth?

There is much to be said for propagating truth. Many Christian communities and movements claim to have a “truth” that they boldly declare as the one that is worth having in this very relativistic and confusing time in which we live. As I consider the claims of religious leaders from my past, I sympathize with Pontius Pilate’s question when faced with the only human who accurately communicated his truth. “What is truth?” Jesus, standing before his accuser, embodying the only perfectly righteous life in human history, is truth. He was the very truth that Pilate question and condemned. Have you ever felt like that? Have you ever stood face to face with truth and found yourself condemning it, casting it before judgment, crucifying it?

Truth in the 22nd century is going to undergo greater scrutiny and persecution than ever. I find it hard to believe that the pattern of individualization of many truths and the relativizing of any sense of universal truth will reverse itself to the degree that the 20th and 21st century Evangelical movement has plead for. Rather than hope in this restoration of some sense of objectivity, I believe it is best to stand, like Pilate did, before the face of truth and start reflecting upon His claims, His life, His truth. That can at least be a starting point for 22nd century truth since it is rooted in the life, the ministry and the mission of our collective Savior.

Photo Credit: Truth & Falsehood by Iza Bella

A Universal Ethic?

A universal ethic has been proposed throughout human history, most notably from Confucius, Jesus, and Immanuel Kant. In the 21st century, it may seem impossible. Cyber cultures illustrate the infinite number of fetishes, pleasures, passions, etc., which reinforce the difficulty of such a possibility. Over the course of my dialogs, several people have commented that there is nothing universally applicable since the postmodern fixation upon linguistics and hermeneutical debates has complicated communication; thus, enabling any ethic to be redefined and used contrary to its original intention.

Despite numerous objections, I would like to propose compassion as our 22nd century universal ethic. To define this – appeasing postmoderns of various persuasions – it is important to consider the Latin meanings of the prefix cum and root pasus.  Cum - with and pasus – to suffer.  To suffer with.  This universal ethic ironically consists of suffering. This is probably not good news to most of us who do not enjoy discomfort or inconvenience, but the good news is that this suffering has a redemptive purpose. Suffering in itself is miserable and oftentimes begs the question, “Why God?” Suffering with or demonstrating compassion is entirely different.  It is the coming alongside the one who is suffering and lending aid, offering a prayer, sitting patiently, enduring the hardship together. It gives meaning and purpose to both sufferer and caregiver.  The sufferer realizes a unique experience of love and acceptance.  There is nothing the sufferer has done to merit this attention.  This act of compassion gives him or her the opportunity to experience agape love, which is the highest form of love in the New Testament worldview.  The care giver then is given the greatest honor of being an ambassador or expression of God in this suffering with the sufferer.  No wonder all major world religions consider this among the greatest of virtues.

22nd century faith is rooted in compassion. In order for the Church to regain its place in the shaping of society in the next century there must be a shift in focus and emphasis.  The time has come to humbly walk alongside those who are suffering from all religious persuasions, from all economic classes, from all nationalities, from all ages and stations in life.  May we be those progressive souls whose love, humility and patience are visibly demonstrated in acts of suffering with the downcast, rejected, oppressed, enslaved.

For more contemplation on compassion, consider this wikipedia article.

Doubt the Movie

Doubt PosterDoubt suggests a striking contrast between the major players and their respective places in the church. Philip Seymour Hoffman plays Father Flynn a controversial figure whose encounter with a young African American alter boy raises the suspicion of Meryl Streep’s character, the principle of the parish school Sister Aloysius Beauvier. Appearances are not what they seem. Father Flynn’s grace based approach to his faith is a huge affront to Sister Beauvier, whose lot in the film is to destroy him, exposing him as a pedophile. This brilliant portrayal on a small scale is a metaphor for an innner struggle which rages inside Christians – the battle between law and grace.

Unfortunately, just as the conflict between Father Flynn and Sister Beauvier hindered the greater work, this inner war too can work against us. Ironically, law and grace are not opposed in Scripture, but their forces work as hammer and anvil on the steel of our souls. Law and grace. Hammer and anvil. Each blow the hammer delivers and the anvil receives tempers the steel, refines it and prepares it for proper use. Grace is so often spoken of a the means by which Christians are empowered to live for Christ, but it is interesting that He Himself said, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.” Christ fulfilled the Law in his ultimate act of grace through his death on the cross.  This crucifixion is enacted in our souls on a daily basis as we, too, fulfill the law. For example, we receive a blow from the hammer of law when we are called to love our enemies.  This is a hard truth, but it can work for our edification. The anvil of grace receives this blow and we are tempered as in the image of Christ.

May we live between this tension of Law and Grace so as to fulfill Christ’s mission on this earth to love, to give, to serve.

 

Priorities

In order to make a healthy mission statement, it is important to discern priorities. This posting is just merely a probe to consider which priorities are significant to our future faith. As I engage in interfaith discussion, I realize that Christianity has been given a bad reputation due to its emphasis on correctness and truth. So, which elements of our faith should be emphasized? Love, Peace, Hope, Truth, Justice, Compassion, Forgiveness, Conversion, Ethical Conformity, Worship, Passion, Purity, Self Control, Salvation, Temperance, Modesty?

 

Of these necessary aspects of Christian faith it seems to me that 21st century faith has majored on: Truth, Forgiveness, Conversion, Salvation, Purity, Temperance and Modesty.

 

Without compromising prior emphases, 22nd century faith must focus upon Love, Peace, Hope, Compassion, and Worship.

 

Where does your priority lie?

 

Pendulums

There tend to be historical “pendulums” in which times transition between two extremes. The 21st century has experienced a remarkable swing in favor of American political strength. This has in turn politicized American Christianity in the guise of movements, most notably against abortion and against the legalization of gay marriage. I believe the pendulum needs to swing back towards an ethical form of Christianity that is informed by Scripture. Politics is a crucial mode of human activity, but ethics also is just as significant. The tendency to attack American Evangelicalism for its hypocrisy has been rooted in this pendulum swing. This does not mean less involvement in politics, but it means that the focus needs to be upon right living, right speech, and right thought – first. 22nd century faith should demonstrate this motto: Purity precedes Politics.

Surrogates

Surrogates Poster
The cyborg, or half human and half machine, of science-fiction may be a daily reality. Surrogates is another recent version of the same 22nd century reality. Technology has been so pertinent in the 21st century that it will become embedded in human consciousness. In an effort to gain a godlike status, mankind will absorb the digital potentialities that transcend the limitations of the human brain as God designed it. These frightening realities must be contemplated now. The Church must have an answer before these things come to pass. What is a proper theology of human consciousness? God created the human brain as one of the most complex entities on the planet. With the potential for microchips and digital interfaces to be implanted, the time to discuss these frightening realities is now before our children and grandchildren are begging to be part of the digital collective consciousness (hive mind) in the 22nd century.

A Time to Listen

The pat answers of Evangelicalism are less relevant today than ever.  We need to understand the world because the Church’s methods are not working.  The Church in the Western world is in decline.  Why?  Because the world feels we don’t understand. The world feels we are too salty and too blinding. Our call is to be salt and light.Too much salt or too much light are bitter and blinding.Excess amounts of either drives away the tongue or eye.However, a proper portion of either will provide savor and clarity.We need to be quiet, calm, savory, lucid as a Christian body.This comes through a heart, like Christ, that is willing to LISTEN. David Crowder gets it. Track 12 says, “Be more quiet now and wait for the voice to say.” Our ears need to do more work, and our tongues need a break. Now is not the time to speak. Now is time to hear the cries of the 21st century world so that the Church of the 22nd century will be well informed and educated in all of the world’s yearnings.

Funny the Way it is

Funny The Way It Is

Dave Matthew’s “Funny the Way It Is” hits on some profound aspects of our society. Injustice is all around. We need to not only consider the poor of Darfur and their plight but also the homeless in D.C. and the prostitutes in Las Vegas. Funny the way it is. The Church has a role in all of these injustices. We need to see the poor at home and abroad through the eyes of Christ. With the compassion and forgiveness that Jesus extends. “Go and sin no more!” is our proclamation throughout the earth. But the necessary thing is to first have the tender touch and the loving eyes that will have no condescension. The Evangelical movement has been quick to proclaim the sin, but the compassion is often either completely absent or significantly delayed. Funny the way that is. The lyrics are worth some contemplation:

Lying in the park on a beautiful day
Sunshine in the grass, and the children play
Siren’s passing, fire engine red
Someone’s house is burning down on a day like this
The evening comes and we’re hanging out
On the front step and a car rolls by with the windows rolled down
And that war song is playing, ‘why can’t we be friends?’
Someone is screaming and crying in the apartment upstairs

Funny the way it is, if you think about it
Somebody’s going hungry and someone else is eating out
Funny the way it is, not right or wrong
Somebody’s heart is broken and it becomes your favorite song

The way your mouth feels in your lovers kiss
Like a pretty bird on a breeze or water to a fish
A bomb blast brings a building crashing to the floor
You hear the laughter while the children play war

Funny the way it is, if you think about it
One kid walks 10 miles to school, another’s dropping out
Funny the way it is, not right or wrong
On a soldier’s last breath his baby’s being born

Standing on a bridge, watch the water passing under me

A Christian Manifesto – Take 2?

Media_httpphotogoodre_diiyf

Nearly thirty years ago, Francis Schaeffer wrote A Christian Manifesto in order to address the Church’s responsibility in the midst of a technological transformation that radically altered the worldview of 1980s society. So many technological generations later, it is time for another manifesto. On the heels of such a revolutionary period in human history, now is the perfect time to pause and consider the times in which we live. This first decade of the twenty-first century is the perfect opportunity for the church to gain its rightful place in the shaping of the next nine decades. A manifesto is presented to the church by the sheer opportunity for Christians to be on the cusp of socio-cultural transformation. A manifesto is presented by the very times in which we live. It is time for the church to rise up to the challenge – to be a global agent of change, to seize the technological advancements and global communications as opportunities, to communicate truth, to call for justice, to encourage the downcast, to be a light amidst growing darkness.